AutoGPTvsLumabri
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | Lumabri | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 187 803 | 202 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v0.8.0 · 12 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 42/100 for Lumabri, so it is the safer default.
Lumabri ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →Lumabri details →