Argo CDvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argo CD | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 24 497 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +272 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 2 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Argo CD scores 81/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Argo CD needs more configuration.
Argo CD is growing faster right now (+272 stars in 30 days).
Argo CD details →url-to-png details →