harnessvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| harness | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 38 746 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +319 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
harness scores 80/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
harness ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
harness is growing faster right now (+319 stars in 30 days).
harness details →url-to-png details →