ArchiveBoxvsArchiveTeam Warrior
Two self-hosted Archiving & Preservation projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ArchiveBox | ArchiveTeam Warrior | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #10 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation |
| GitHub stars | 28 894 | 461 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +314 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.9.77 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Python | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
ArchiveBox scores 79/100 against 44/100 for ArchiveTeam Warrior, so it is the safer default.
ArchiveBox ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ArchiveTeam Warrior.
ArchiveBox is growing faster right now (+314 stars in 30 days).
ArchiveBox details →ArchiveTeam Warrior details →All Archiving & Preservation projects →
Swap a project
Keep ArchiveBox, compare it with
Keep ArchiveTeam Warrior, compare it with