ArchiveTeam Warriorvsspacedrive
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ArchiveTeam Warrior | spacedrive | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #4 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 461 | 39 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +314 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
spacedrive scores 70/100 against 44/100 for ArchiveTeam Warrior, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, ArchiveTeam Warrior is easier to run; spacedrive needs more configuration.
spacedrive is growing faster right now (+314 stars in 30 days).
ArchiveTeam Warrior details →spacedrive details →
Swap a project
Keep ArchiveTeam Warrior, compare it with
Keep spacedrive, compare it with