AppsmithvsHealthchecks
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Appsmith | Healthchecks | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Internal Tools | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 41 134 | 10 466 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +203 | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 12 |
| Latest release | v2.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Appsmith scores 80/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Appsmith ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
Appsmith details →Healthchecks details →
Swap a project
Keep Appsmith, compare it with
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with