BackstagevsHealthchecks
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Backstage | Healthchecks | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 34 737 | 10 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 | +106 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Backstage scores 79/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.
Backstage details →Healthchecks details →