apitablevstxtdot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | txtdot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #19 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | v1.10.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
apitable scores 65/100 against 47/100 for txtdot, so it is the safer default.
txtdot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, txtdot is easier to run; apitable needs more configuration.
apitable is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →txtdot details →