langflowvstxtdot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | txtdot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #19 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 156 121 | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +899 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.10.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 47/100 for txtdot, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for txtdot.
If you want the quickest setup, txtdot is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+899 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →txtdot details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep txtdot, compare it with