apitablevsrpi-mqtt-monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | rpi-mqtt-monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
apitable scores 65/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
rpi-mqtt-monitor ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
apitable is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →rpi-mqtt-monitor details →