langflowvsrpi-mqtt-monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | rpi-mqtt-monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 156 115 | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +924 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.
langflow is growing faster right now (+924 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →rpi-mqtt-monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with