ANASvsRustFS
Two self-hosted Storage projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ANAS | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Storage | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 210 | 35 490 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 758 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.4.4 · 18 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 43/100 for ANAS, so it is the safer default.
ANAS ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 758 stars in 30 days).
ANAS details →RustFS details →All Storage projects →
Swap a project
Keep ANAS, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with