ANASvsOpenMediaVault
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ANAS | OpenMediaVault | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Storage | #5 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 210 | 7 038 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +71 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.4.4 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
OpenMediaVault scores 71/100 against 43/100 for ANAS, so it is the safer default.
ANAS ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OpenMediaVault.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenMediaVault is easier to run; ANAS needs more configuration.
OpenMediaVault is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).
ANAS details →OpenMediaVault details →
Swap a project
Keep ANAS, compare it with
Keep OpenMediaVault, compare it with