amurex-backendvsDeepSeek Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| amurex-backend | DeepSeek Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 37/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #99 of 120 in AI Assistant | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 145 | 264 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +8 660 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 37/100 for amurex-backend, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; amurex-backend needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 660 stars in 30 days).
amurex-backend details →DeepSeek Harness details →
Swap a project
Keep amurex-backend, compare it with
Keep DeepSeek Harness, compare it with