Activepiecesvssuna
Two self-hosted n8n alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | suna | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #25 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 25 265 | 20 327 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +565 | +94 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 150 |
| Latest release | 0.92.3-hotfix.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.14.8 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 81/100 against 71/100 for suna, so it is the safer default.
suna ships more often: 150 stable releases in the past year, against 37 for Activepieces.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; suna needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+565 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →suna details → All n8n alternatives →