abs-kosync-bridgevsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| abs-kosync-bridge | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 16 060 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +245 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 31 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 57/100 for abs-kosync-bridge, so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for abs-kosync-bridge.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; abs-kosync-bridge needs more configuration.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+245 stars in 30 days).
abs-kosync-bridge details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →
Swap a project
Keep abs-kosync-bridge, compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with