LibationvsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 | 16 058 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +243 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 31 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 31 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP).
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Libation needs more configuration.
Libation details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with