AudiobookshelfvsOpencast
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Audiobookshelf | Opencast | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #38 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 839 | 509 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +402 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | 19.10 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | ECL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 57/100 for Opencast, so it is the safer default.
Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Opencast.
If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.
Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+402 stars in 30 days).
Audiobookshelf details →Opencast details →
Swap a project
Keep Audiobookshelf, compare it with
Keep Opencast, compare it with