abs-kosync-bridgevsLAN-Orangutan
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| abs-kosync-bridge | LAN-Orangutan | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 1 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 7 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
LAN-Orangutan scores 58/100 against 57/100 for abs-kosync-bridge, so it is the safer default.
abs-kosync-bridge ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.
If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; abs-kosync-bridge needs more configuration.
LAN-Orangutan is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
abs-kosync-bridge details →LAN-Orangutan details →
Swap a project
Keep abs-kosync-bridge, compare it with
Keep LAN-Orangutan, compare it with