LAN-OrangutanvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LAN-Orangutan | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 140 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +63 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 21 |
| Latest release | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.
If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+63 stars in 30 days).
LAN-Orangutan details →ReadMeABook details →