World MonitorvsZigbee2MQTT
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| World Monitor | Zigbee2MQTT | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 89 750 | 15 764 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 411 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 76/100 for Zigbee2MQTT, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Zigbee2MQTT.
If you want the quickest setup, Zigbee2MQTT is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 411 stars in 30 days).
World Monitor details →Zigbee2MQTT details →
Swap a project
Keep World Monitor, compare it with
Keep Zigbee2MQTT, compare it with