World Monitorvsytdlp_web_player
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| World Monitor | ytdlp_web_player | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 89 742 | 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 403 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for ytdlp_web_player.
If you want the quickest setup, ytdlp_web_player is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 403 stars in 30 days).
World Monitor details →ytdlp_web_player details →
Swap a project
Keep World Monitor, compare it with
Keep ytdlp_web_player, compare it with