World Monitorvsyoutube-dl-nas
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| World Monitor | youtube-dl-nas | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #27 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 89 732 | 201 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 393 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 | 26.1029 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 50/100 for youtube-dl-nas, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for youtube-dl-nas.
If you want the quickest setup, youtube-dl-nas is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 393 stars in 30 days).
World Monitor details →youtube-dl-nas details →
Swap a project
Keep World Monitor, compare it with
Keep youtube-dl-nas, compare it with