Workout.coolvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Workout.cool | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 650 | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
Workout.cool details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with