openGymvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openGym | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 111 | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 942 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.4.3 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
openGym scores 81/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
openGym ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, openGym is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
openGym is growing faster right now (+2 942 stars in 30 days).
openGym details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep openGym, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with