Workout.coolvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Workout.cool | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 8 652 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +153 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).
Workout.cool details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with