ryotvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 3 650 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +44 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 9 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ryot and Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
ryot is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).
ryot details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with