Workout.coolvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Workout.cool | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 653 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +154 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
wraft ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).
Workout.cool details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with