SparkyFitnessvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SparkyFitness | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 503 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +392 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
SparkyFitness scores 66/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, SparkyFitness is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).
SparkyFitness details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep SparkyFitness, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with