woodpecker-civsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| woodpecker-ci | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 28 in CI/CD | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 8 065 | 16 058 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +243 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 31 |
| Latest release | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →