woodpecker-civsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| woodpecker-ci | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 28 in CI/CD | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 8 065 | 89 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +2 430 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 17 |
| Latest release | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 430 stars in 30 days).
woodpecker-ci details →World Monitor details →