WhiteboardvsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Whiteboard | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 10 in Code Review | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 3 381 | 53 765 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +370 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 |
| Latest release | diffr/0.1.22 · 26 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 56/100 for Whiteboard, so it is the safer default.
WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Whiteboard.
If you want the quickest setup, Whiteboard is easier to run; WindowsinDocker needs more configuration.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+370 stars in 30 days).
Whiteboard details →WindowsinDocker details →