WhiteboardvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Whiteboard | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 10 in Code Review | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 3 381 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | diffr/0.1.22 · 26 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 56/100 for Whiteboard, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Whiteboard.
If you want the quickest setup, Whiteboard is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Whiteboard is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).
Whiteboard details →Windows ARM details →