SonarQubevsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SonarQube | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Code Review | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 11 125 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +103 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 10 |
| Latest release | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
SonarQube scores 71/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
SonarQube is growing faster right now (+103 stars in 30 days).
SonarQube details →Windows ARM details →