WhisperLive---CPUvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| WhisperLive---CPU | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 6 in Transcription | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 4 338 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
WhisperLive---CPU and Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
If you want the quickest setup, WhisperLive---CPU is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
WhisperLive---CPU is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).
WhisperLive---CPU details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with