anarlogvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| anarlog | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 9 621 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 9 |
| Latest release | desktop_v1.4.33 · 27 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
anarlog scores 70/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for anarlog.
If you want the quickest setup, anarlog is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
anarlog is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).
anarlog details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep anarlog, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with