anarlogvsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| anarlog | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 9 616 | 4 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +70 | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | desktop_v1.4.33 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
anarlog scores 70/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, anarlog is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.
anarlog details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep anarlog, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with