WhisperLive---CPUvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| WhisperLive---CPU | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 6 in Transcription | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 4 338 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
WhisperLive---CPU scores 64/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, WhisperLive---CPU is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
WhisperLive---CPU is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).
WhisperLive---CPU details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with