anarlogvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| anarlog | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 9 621 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | desktop_v1.4.33 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
anarlog scores 70/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, anarlog is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
anarlog is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).
anarlog details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep anarlog, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with