Wazuhvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Wazuh | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 17 476 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +491 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 | v3.19.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Wazuh scores 80/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Wazuh.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.
Wazuh is growing faster right now (+491 stars in 30 days).
Wazuh details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Wazuh, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with