WastebinvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Wastebin | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 19 in Pastebins | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 880 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 10 |
| Latest release | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Wastebin is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).
Wastebin details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Wastebin, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with