rustypastevsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rustypaste | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 86 in File Sharing | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 214 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.18.1 · 7 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 56/100 for rustypaste, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for rustypaste.
If you want the quickest setup, rustypaste is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
rustypaste is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).
rustypaste details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep rustypaste, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with