MicroBinvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MicroBin | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Pastebins | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 4 626 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.1.4 · 8 Mar 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
MicroBin scores 67/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MicroBin.
If you want the quickest setup, MicroBin is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
MicroBin is growing faster right now (+58 stars in 30 days).
MicroBin details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep MicroBin, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with