WakupatorvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Wakupator | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 22 in Home Server | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 89 727 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 388 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wakupator.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 388 stars in 30 days).
Wakupator details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep Wakupator, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with