Pi-holevsWakupator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | Wakupator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 61 541 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +497 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 1 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | C |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wakupator.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; Wakupator needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →Wakupator details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Wakupator, compare it with