WA-AKGvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| WA-AKG | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 110 in Chat | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 803 | 89 727 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +2 388 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.7.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 56/100 for WA-AKG, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for WA-AKG.
If you want the quickest setup, WA-AKG is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 388 stars in 30 days).
WA-AKG details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep WA-AKG, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with