chatwootvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chatwoot | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 38 507 | 89 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 385 | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 17 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 84/100 for chatwoot, so it is the safer default.
chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
chatwoot details →World Monitor details →