voidaccessvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| voidaccess | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #28 of 78 in Security | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 948 | 89 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 430 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 17 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 430 stars in 30 days).
voidaccess details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep voidaccess, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with