UUSEC WAFvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| UUSEC WAF | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 719 | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
UUSEC WAF details →zookeeper details →