crowdsecvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| crowdsec | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 78 in Security | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 363 | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +407 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.8.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
crowdsec scores 76/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
crowdsec ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
crowdsec is growing faster right now (+407 stars in 30 days).
crowdsec details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep crowdsec, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with